Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Habel, Jan C.
dc.contributor.author
Gossner, Martin M.
dc.contributor.author
Schmitt, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned
2021-06-22T07:47:22Z
dc.date.available
2021-06-22T04:40:07Z
dc.date.available
2021-06-22T07:47:22Z
dc.date.issued
2021
dc.identifier.issn
1572-9710
dc.identifier.issn
0960-3115
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s10531-021-02204-9
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/490641
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000490641
dc.description.abstract
Prioritization is crucial in nature conservation, as land and financial resources are limited. Selection procedures must follow objective criteria, and not primarily subjective aspects, such as charisma. In this study, we assessed the level of charisma for all European butterflies. Based on these data, we analysed the charisma values of the species listed on the annexes of the EU Habitats Directive and of the species being of conservation priority according to criteria derived by three objective criteria: Species ecological specialisation, distribution, and threat. The mean level of charisma was higher for species of the EU Habitats Directive than for species of conservation priority and for not-listed species. Five of the twenty most charismatic species were also listed on the EU Habitats Directive, but none occurred on the list of species being of conservation priority. A trait space analysis revealed remarkable differences between the different species assortments: The species listed on the EU Habitats Directive covered a large trait space and included many species with high charismatic value, but low ecological and biogeographical relevance, while species of high conservation priority covered a restricted trait space and did not overlap with charismatic species. According to our findings, the selection of species for nature conservation still follows a mix of being aesthetic combined with some ecological criteria.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Springer
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Butterflies
en_US
dc.subject
Biodiversity conservation
en_US
dc.subject
Prioritizing
en_US
dc.subject
Charismatic species
en_US
dc.subject
Endangered species
en_US
dc.subject
Specialist species
en_US
dc.subject
EU Habitat Directive
en_US
dc.title
Just beautiful?! What determines butterfly species for nature conservation
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2021-06-07
ethz.journal.title
Biodiversity and Conservation
ethz.journal.volume
30
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
8-9
en_US
ethz.pages.start
2481
en_US
ethz.pages.end
2493
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
Dordrecht
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2021-06-22T04:40:10Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2021-06-22T07:47:29Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2022-03-29T10:01:20Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Just%20beautiful?!%20What%20determines%20butterfly%20species%20for%20nature%20conservation&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20Conservation&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8-9&rft.spage=2481&rft.epage=2493&rft.issn=1572-9710&0960-3115&rft.au=Habel,%20Jan%20C.&Gossner,%20Martin%20M.&Schmitt,%20Thomas&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-021-02204-9&
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record