Brain dynamics of (a)typical reading development—a review of longitudinal studies
dc.contributor.author
Jednoróg K.
dc.contributor.author
Chyl, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.author
Fraga-González, Gorka
dc.contributor.author
Brem, Silvia
dc.date.accessioned
2021-06-16T05:42:10Z
dc.date.available
2021-06-10T05:19:01Z
dc.date.available
2021-06-16T05:42:10Z
dc.date.issued
2021-02-01
dc.identifier.issn
2056-7936
dc.identifier.other
10.1038/s41539-020-00081-5
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/489034
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000489034
dc.description.abstract
Literacy development is a process rather than a single event and thus should be studied at multiple time points. A longitudinal design employing neuroimaging methods offers the possibility to identify neural changes associated with reading development, and to reveal early markers of dyslexia. The core of this review is a summary of findings from longitudinal neuroimaging studies on typical and atypical reading development. Studies focused on the prediction of reading gains with a single neuroimaging time point complement this review. Evidence from structural studies suggests that reading development results in increased structural integrity and functional specialization of left-hemispheric language areas. Compromised integrity of some of these tracts in children at risk for dyslexia might be compensated by higher anatomical connectivity in the homologous right hemisphere tracts. Regarding function, activation in phonological and audiovisual integration areas and growing sensitivity to print in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex (vOT) seem to be relevant neurodevelopmental markers of successful reading acquisition. Atypical vOT responses at the beginning of reading training and infant auditory brain potentials have been proposed as neuroimaging predictors of dyslexia that can complement behavioral measures. Besides these insights, longitudinal neuroimaging studies on reading and dyslexia are still relatively scarce and small sample sizes raise legitimate concerns about the reliability of the results. This review discusses the challenges of these studies and provides recommendations to improve this research area. Future longitudinal research with larger sample sizes are needed to improve our knowledge of typical and atypical reading neurodevelopment.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Springer
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Dyslexia
en_US
dc.subject
Reading
en_US
dc.title
Brain dynamics of (a)typical reading development—a review of longitudinal studies
en_US
dc.type
Review Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
ethz.journal.title
npj Science of Learning
ethz.journal.volume
6
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
1
en_US
ethz.journal.abbreviated
npj Sci. Learn.
ethz.pages.start
4
en_US
ethz.size
9 p.
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.wos
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
London
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2021-06-10T05:19:06Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2021-06-16T05:42:21Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2024-02-02T14:07:02Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Brain%20dynamics%20of%20(a)typical%20reading%20development%E2%80%94a%20review%20of%20longitudinal%20studies&rft.jtitle=npj%20Science%20of%20Learning&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.issn=2056-7936&rft.au=Jednor%C3%B3g%20K.&Chyl,%20Katarzyna&Fraga-Gonz%C3%A1lez,%20Gorka&Brem,%20Silvia&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41539-020-00081-5&
Files in this item
Publication type
-
Review Article [4096]