Fact Box decision support tools reduce decisional conflict about antibiotics for pneumonia and artificial hydration in advanced dementia: a randomized controlled trail
Abstract
Background: fact Boxes are decision support tools that can inform about treatment effects.
Objectives: to test whether Fact Box decision support tools impacted decisional conflict, knowledge and preferences about the use of antibiotics and artificial hydration in advanced dementia.
Design: randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Swiss-German region of Switzerland.
Subjects: two hundred thirty-two participants (64 physicians, 100 relatives of dementia patients, 68 professional guardians) randomly allocated to intervention (N = 114) or control (N = 118).
Intervention: two-page Fact Box decision support tools on antibiotics for pneumonia and artificial hydration in advanced dementia (at 1-month).
Methods: participants were mailed questionnaires at baseline and one month later that asked questions about treatments based on hypothetical scenarios. The primary outcome was change in decisional conflict (DCS-D; range 0 < 100) about treatment decisions. Secondary outcomes included knowledge about treatments (range 0 < 7) and preferences to forego treatments.
Results: participants were: mean age, 55.6 years; female, 62.8%. Relative to control participants, intervention participants experienced less decisional conflict about using antibiotics (unstandardized beta (b) = −8.35, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), −12.43, −4.28) and artificial hydration (b = −6.02, 95% CI, −9.84, −2.20) at 1-month compared to baseline. Intervention participants displayed greater knowledge about the use of antibiotics (b = 2.24, 95% CI, 1.79, 2.68) and artificial hydration (b = 3.01, 95% CI, 2.53, 3.49), and were significantly more likely to prefer to forego antibiotics (odds ratio, 2.29, 95% CI, 1.08, 4.84) but not artificial hydration.
Conclusions: fact Box decision support tools reduced decisional conflict, increased knowledge and promoted preferences to forego antibiotics in advanced dementia among various decision-makers.
Trial registration: FORSbase (12091). Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000394166Publication status
publishedExternal links
Journal / series
Age and AgeingVolume
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
Oxford University PressSubject
dementia; decision-making; decision aid; palliative care; risk communicationOrganisational unit
02803 - Collegium Helveticum / Collegium Helveticum
Notes
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.More
Show all metadata
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics