Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Vannier, Clémence
dc.contributor.author
Lasseur, Rémy
dc.contributor.author
Crouzat, Emilie
dc.contributor.author
Byczek, Coline
dc.contributor.author
Lafond, Valentine
dc.contributor.author
Cordonnier, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Longaretti, Pierre-Yves
dc.contributor.author
Lavorel, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned
2019-02-22T13:32:58Z
dc.date.available
2019-02-16T03:29:11Z
dc.date.available
2019-02-22T13:32:58Z
dc.date.issued
2019
dc.identifier.issn
2639-5908
dc.identifier.issn
2639-5916
dc.identifier.other
10.1080/26395916.2019.1570971
en_US
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/325529
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000325529
dc.description.abstract
Recent institutional and policy frameworks prescribe the incorporation of ecosystem services (ES) into land use management and planning, favouring co-production of ES assessments by stakeholders, land planners and scientists. Incorporating ES into land management and planning requires models to map and analyze ES. Also, because ES do not vary independently, many operational issues ultimately relate to the mitigation of ES trade-offs, so that multiple ES and their interactions need to be considered. Using a highly accurate LULC database for the Grenoble urban region (French Alps), we mapped twelve ES using a range of models of varied complexity. A specific, fine-grained (less than 1 ha) LULC database at regional scale (4450 km²) added great spatial precision in individual ES models, in spite of limits of the typological resolution for forests and semi-natural areas. We analysed ES bundles within three different socio-ecosystems and associated landscape types (periurban, rural and forest areas). Such type-specific bundles highlighted distinctive ES trade-offs and synergies for each landscape. Advanced approaches combining remote sensing, targeted field data collection and expert knowledge from scientists and stakeholders are expected to provide the significant progress that is now required to support the reduction of trade-offs and enhance synergies between management objectives.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
Taylor & Francis
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Ecosystem service mapping
en_US
dc.subject
ecosystem service bundles
en_US
dc.subject
land use and land cover
en_US
dc.subject
mountain landscapes
en_US
dc.title
Mapping ecosystem services bundles in a heterogeneous mountain region
en_US
dc.type
Journal Article
dc.rights.license
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.date.published
2019-02-05
ethz.journal.title
Ecosystems and People
ethz.journal.volume
15
en_US
ethz.journal.issue
1
en_US
ethz.pages.start
74
en_US
ethz.pages.end
88
en_US
ethz.version.deposit
publishedVersion
en_US
ethz.identifier.scopus
ethz.publication.place
London
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2019-02-16T03:29:18Z
ethz.source
SCOPUS
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2019-02-22T13:33:06Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2024-02-02T07:13:01Z
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Mapping%20ecosystem%20services%20bundles%20in%20a%20heterogeneous%20mountain%20region&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20and%20People&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=88&rft.issn=2639-5908&2639-5916&rft.au=Vannier,%20Cl%C3%A9mence&Lasseur,%20R%C3%A9my&Crouzat,%20Emilie&Byczek,%20Coline&Lafond,%20Valentine&rft.genre=article&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/26395916.2019.1570971&
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record