Open access
Author
Date
2019Type
- Doctoral Thesis
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics
Abstract
Sarajevo’s contested position at the intersection of geopolitical ‘tectonic plates’ –
situated between Rome and Byzantium, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires,
the Western and Eastern Bloc, de-colonization and re-colonization – resulted in
both fertile periods of exchange and moments of devastating conflicts. This inbetweenness
has contributed to the (dis)continuous cityscape, characterized by a
diversity of spatial productions and radical urban transformations. Therefore,
Sarajevo represents an urban laboratory for social and spatial transformation
processes.
The ETHZ/UTT ‘Urban Toolbox’ provided a cross-scalar methodological
approach for examining the physical typology, program, and actors of Sarajevo’s
urbanism, spanning from spatial and stakeholder analyses synthesized through
critical mapping to the identification of strategic scenarios and the use of digital
media.
This dissertation zooms both in and out on three time periods between 1945 and
2014, defined by three distinct revolutionary moments. The central theme of this
project is the examination of the transformative processes with the focus on the
district of Marijin Dvor in New Sarajevo. Previously a peripheral zone, it became a
central operational laboratory of the new Sarajevo to test the effects of major
geopolitical shifts on the 'heart' and 'brain' of the city. While investigating multiple
spatial crystallization points, one building epitomized the correlation between
geopolitical power and space – the Museum of the Revolution – a living symbol of
the three periods of construction, destruction and fragmentation.
The proclamation of Tito’s communist revolution in 1945 and the establishment of
a socialist Yugoslav federation, created pressing spatial demands for the new urban
proletariat. The industrialization and rural-urban migration gave birth to the city’s
first strategic urbanistic model, enabled by proclaiming the collectivization of land
as a common good. The City Planning Institute developed the first General Urban
Plan (GUP-Generalni Urbanistički Plan) in 1961. This large-scale urban planning
instrument was enabled by the Yugoslav decentralized model of self-management
that also included the ‘Mjesne Zajednice’ (MZs), the local communities. These new
societal postulates were decisive for the construction of the flagship project for
Sarajevo and its nucleus, Marijin Dvor, as a cultural, educational and industrial hub of
BiH, one of Yugoslavia’s most ethnically diverse and rural regions. Architects and
urbanists were tasked with planning, designing and building a New Sarajevo as a
socialist utopia. Buildings, such as the Museum of the Revolution, were constructed
as monuments to celebrate both the victory of the partisans over Nazi Germany and
the new state design ideology: functionalist modernism. The construction of Marijin
Dvor was catalyzed by the Winter Olympic Games, hosted by Sarajevo in 1984 as a
result of Yugoslavia’s non-aligned foreign policy and the city’s status as ‘terra
neutral`.
Later in 1992, as socialist Yugoslavia began to crumble after the geopolitical
vacuum of post-1989 Europe, Marijin Dvor became the site of the fruitless peace
protests. The city was put under military siege and New Sarajevo was divided along
a frontline. Under wartime conditions, the urban utopia was de-urbanized. The
collapse of urban infrastructure and the destruction of the human habitat,
characterized in Bogdan Bogdanović’s description of urbicide, reached its peak in
Sarajevo. During this period, Marijin Dvor went through a radical transformation:
public spaces became graveyards or urban-agricultural zones for survival. The
Museum of the Revolution found itself at the frontline and was bombed as the
symbol of a common Yugoslav past. Nevertheless, in acts of popular resistance,
destroyed buildings became temporary art spaces. Derelict parks turned into
agricultural zones. This attracted a wave of global solidarity as intellectuals visited
Sarajevo, including the architect Lebbeus Woods, and formed a vital part of the antiwar
movement, analyzing the destruction and proposing both small adaptations and
radical post-war reconstruction visions.
However, these visions did not adhere to the post-socialist and post-war realities of
the newly ethnically divided Sarajevo resulting from the 1995 Dayton Peace
Agreement. Common properties had been converted into state ones, which were
then auctioned off in a massive privatization wave. These policies fell in line with the
country’s market liberalization. Within these new realities, MZs maintained the same
level of legal status, but under the extreme pressure by neoliberal urban
development. New economic and urban mechanisms led to aggressive
development driven by investments from across the geopolitical spectrum, which
disregarded already destroyed public space in favor of monocultures of generic
commercial architecture. Marijin Dvor became a high-density node of real estate
speculations and a symbol of socio-economic segregation and spatial
fragmentation. The refugia of public space were found in administrative grey-zones
of the post-war constitutional changes. Politically contaminated and left out of the
legal system and with a new name and no program as a consequence, the Historical
Museum, once the Museum of the Revolution, became a host to civic engagements,
inviting citizens to figure as curators. This new system and its accompanying urban
model revealed ruptures in 2014, symbolized through violent mass protests of the
so-called ‘Bosnian Spring’. Impoverished and unemployed, Sarajevans turned their
anger and desperation against the city’s governmental buildings.
The dissertation includes ‘Reactivate Sarajevo’, an activist experiment of spatial
agency that connects theory and practice by engaging in-situ. Influenced by both
the pioneers of reflective practice, Donald Schön and Kurt Lewin, and the
ETHZ/UTT concept of the activist architect, ‘Reactivate Sarajevo’ exposes the
dissertation’s work-in-progress to the public. This discourse was initiated through
the organization of expert symposia, stakeholder workshops and open discussions
with the general public. The production of discourse, curation of performances and
reflection of these actions mutually nurtured the theoretical chapters. These acts
spawned critical mapping and alternative design concepts, presented through an
interactive digital platform, as well as a strategy of inversion to represent Sarajevo
and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2016 at the International Architecture Biennale in
Venice for the first time in the country’s history. The exhibition showcased not only
critical research, but also alternative design concepts amplifying civic action as a
basis for the integrated and inclusive development of Marijin Dvor. The insights were
then transferred back to Sarajevo back via the ‘Balkan route’ and the exhibition was
installed in the Historical Museum.
The Experiment contributed to the creation of a network of formal and informal
partnerships locally and laid the groundwork for a future urban design and planning
project concerning the future planning of Marijin Dvor and Sarajevo. This approach
of action research resonated throughout the Balkans and other regions through
workshops, lectures and consultancies and formed the basis for the extrapolation
and application of the insights to other cities. Show more
Permanent link
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000404735Publication status
publishedExternal links
Search print copy at ETH Library
Contributors
Examiner: Klumpner, Hubert
Examiner: Mimica, Vedran
Examiner: Haas, Tigran
Examiner: Memišević, Gordana
Publisher
ETH ZurichSubject
Urban planning; Architecture; Urban design; Integrated urban development; Urban transformationOrganisational unit
03882 - Klumpner, Hubert / Klumpner, Hubert
02655 - Netzwerk Stadt u. Landschaft ARCH u BAUG / Network City and Landscape ARCH and BAUG
Funding
152599 - Smart Cities for knowledge based societies in CEE (SNF)
More
Show all metadata
ETH Bibliography
yes
Altmetrics