Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.author
Rigger, Eugen
dc.contributor.supervisor
Shea, Kristina
dc.contributor.supervisor
Duffy, Alex
dc.contributor.supervisor
Stankovic, Tino
dc.date.accessioned
2019-12-03T13:54:47Z
dc.date.available
2019-12-03T13:29:06Z
dc.date.available
2019-12-03T13:54:47Z
dc.date.issued
2019
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/382356
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000382356
dc.description.abstract
Design automation has been the focus of research for more than five decades. It supports design processes in several aspects by automating design tasks based on computational methods and tools to save time, generate alternative design solutions, explore solution spaces, and reuse engineering knowledge. Yet, the current industrial practice does not reflect the opportunities provided by state-of-the-art design automation methods. The factors contributing to this gap are: first, a lack of knowledge of design automation opportunities and insufficient support for the integration of design automation in design practice including the supporting methods and technological environments. Second, metrics and methods for comprehensive estimation of the impact of design automation implementation on design practice do not exist making it difficult to quantify the value of design automation and justify efforts for implementation. Finally, design automation applications are often perceived as black-box systems since knowledge is hard-coded in design automation applications. This also increases efforts for knowledge formalization. In response to these issues, this thesis proposes a methodology for design automation task definition that features collaborative workshops to account for the different viewpoints of designers. It builds upon a design automation task categorization that is characterized by the knowledge levels required for design automation task definition and consists of four different methods that build on each other. The first method focuses on the identification of design automation use cases. It features detailed analysis of design processes and reuse of design automation task templates to support both the identification of possible use cases and the integration of the corresponding software applications into design practice. The second method introduces a top-down derivation of metrics based on potential failure modes in design. The third method enables estimation of the impact and value of design automation implementation based on design automation task templates enabling reuse and associating metrics to design processes. Finally, design automation task formalization by designers is enabled using graphical modeling. The method supports reuse and modularization of knowledge based on the design automation task categorization. To enable reasoning in the context of the methodology, a meta-model that clarifies the vocabulary is established based on standardized languages. The proposed methodology is evaluated based on three industrial use cases that highlight the necessity to involve multiple designers for design automation task definition to account for different viewpoints for needs identification. Further, the results show the potential for design automation application in the early stages of design as well as the applicability of the proposed approach for design automation task formalization by designers. Thus, the work presented in this thesis contributes by ii introducing and evaluating a novel methodology for design automation task definition that brings the opportunities of state-of-the-art design automation methods into line with designers’ needs. It extends the state-of-the-art with respect to new methods supporting design automation task definition and also consolidates research in design automation. Thereby, the methodology enables alignment of research on design automation and increases awareness of design automation opportunities in industry among the different stages of the design process.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
ETH Zurich
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-NC/1.0/
dc.title
Task Definition for Design Automation
en_US
dc.type
Doctoral Thesis
dc.rights.license
In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted
dc.date.published
2019-12-03
ethz.size
211 p.
en_US
ethz.code.ddc
DDC - DDC::6 - Technology, medicine and applied sciences::620 - Engineering & allied operations
en_US
ethz.identifier.diss
26019
en_US
ethz.publication.place
Zurich
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02130 - Dep. Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik / Dep. of Mechanical and Process Eng.::02665 - Inst. f. Design, Mat. und Fabrikation / Inst. of Design, Materials a Fabrication::03954 - Shea, Kristina / Shea, Kristina
en_US
ethz.leitzahl.certified
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02130 - Dep. Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik / Dep. of Mechanical and Process Eng.::02665 - Inst. f. Design, Mat. und Fabrikation / Inst. of Design, Materials a Fabrication::03954 - Shea, Kristina / Shea, Kristina
en_US
ethz.date.deposited
2019-12-03T13:29:14Z
ethz.source
FORM
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2019-12-03T13:55:03Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2022-03-29T00:24:45Z
ethz.rosetta.exportRequired
true
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=Task%20Definition%20for%20Design%20Automation&rft.date=2019&rft.au=Rigger,%20Eugen&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Task%20Definition%20for%20Design%20Automation
 Printexemplar via ETH-Bibliothek suchen

Dateien zu diesem Eintrag

Thumbnail

Publikationstyp

Zur Kurzanzeige