Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author
Papamichail, Theodora
dc.contributor.supervisor
Scholl, Bernd
dc.contributor.supervisor
Pappas, Vassilis
dc.contributor.supervisor
Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne
dc.date.accessioned
2019-11-06T15:42:52Z
dc.date.available
2019-11-06T11:11:15Z
dc.date.available
2019-11-06T15:42:52Z
dc.date.issued
2019
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/375705
dc.identifier.doi
10.3929/ethz-b-000375705
dc.description.abstract
Formal planning instruments and procedures in Greece have often been unpopular and ineffective in solving spatial conflicts such as urban sprawl or transport congestion. Thus, a non-legally binding supplement is often considered highly effective. In the particular case of spatial and railway development in Patras, Greece, this was triggered by the implementation of an informal planning method (the Test Planning Process). In this case, the aim was to explore alternative and feasible scenarios towards a common solution and stimulate joint responsibility in decision-making, since the formal procedures and plans failed to achieve progress, promoting for almost two decades the infeasible solution of the construction of an urban tunnel. Even though informal planning resulted in a spectrum of alternative ideas, fostering the public discussion, institutional conflicts based on hierarchical mandates and private interests in favour of the urban tunnel continued. Hence, this questions the efficacy of existing formal planning instruments, including those of public participation, in dealing with such complex planning tasks, while also raising open questions about the interplay between formal and informal planning, especially in environments with only a partially developed culture in planning cooperation. In the light of this exploration, Greece becomes a significant spatial laboratory to test if and how synergies between formal and informal planning processes can emerge and influence spatial conflicts. The territorial scope focuses on the Peloponnese Peninsula and concerns the multi-functional concept of tourism-oriented railway development. The region illustrates a potential in culture, history, landscape, architecture and tourism infrastructure in the vicinity of a diverse railway network, while an upward trend in tourism for the country (28.4 Mio arrivals, 2016) offers the opportunity for new tourism products and models. Additionally, the railway as a means of transport addresses the requirements of EU infrastructure policies for environmentally friendly transport infrastructure, economic development, social and territorial cohesion on international, national regional and local levels. Greece holds a strategic position in the European core network (ΤΕΝ-Τ, Orient-East Med. Corridor), a component of which is also the strategic transport corridor known as PATHE (Patras- Athens- Thessaloniki- Eidomeni). Concerning the Peloponnese, this means that only the northern part from Athens to Patras has a funding priority according to EU Policies. The concept of this thesis is to explore the reactivation of the railway network as a backbone of an integral public transport system that supports a slow and responsible model of tourism towards sustainable spatial development, highlighting the role of the railway combined with tourism. In order to boost multi-functional concepts, such as that of tourism-oriented development in the Peloponnese, there is need for a revision of the formal instruments towards intersectoral and multi-level collaboration, since multiple adversarial interests emerge. The hypothesis concentrates on the fact that synergies between formal and informal planning are achieved when based on reciprocal learning processes. This underlines the elements of complementarity and embeddedness of informal planning in formal planning procedures, which is not a given actuality even in environments with a comprehensive planning culture. To explore this hypothesis, the methodology based on qualitative data analysis aims to formulate and test an interpretative model regarding regional design strategies in the Peloponnese, focusing on the railway corridor that currently possesses relatively important residential and tourism nodes. The thinking pattern for this model regarding the exploration of hypotheses and problem-solving processes finds its roots in the action-oriented planning approach. Taking into consideration the existing spatial conditions of the region, the proposed tourism-oriented scenarios and joint processes between formal and informal responsibility offer an incentive to discover more open issues concerning sustainable spatial development in a short- and long - term horizon. The Peloponnese Peninsula therefore indicates potential for spatial development, rather than a specific problem. This highlights the proactive role of planning based on carefully designed strategies versus differing and fast-track solutions. Since the region still faces several socioeconomic challenges, such as in public transport, industry or demographics, the multi-functional concept of tourism-oriented railway development provides the chance to develop strategies towards sustainable regional development. This entails politicians and spatial planners shifting their mindsets about planning processes to improve decision- making in complex planning tasks, which can boost the socioeconomic rehabilitation of the Peloponnese and, in turn, the desired decentralisation of supersaturated urban areas such as Athens. In other words, the concept of ‘spatial synergies’ among the actors, the planning process and content, becomes a key approach for spatial conflicts both in Greece and other countries that face similar problems of spatial development.
en_US
dc.format
application/pdf
en_US
dc.language.iso
en
en_US
dc.publisher
ETH Zurich
en_US
dc.rights.uri
http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-NC/1.0/
dc.title
SPATIAL SYNERGIES - Synergies between formal and informal planning as a key concept towards spatial conflicts – the case of tourism-oriented railway development in the Peloponnese
en_US
dc.type
Doctoral Thesis
dc.rights.license
In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted
dc.date.published
2019-11-06
ethz.size
150 p.
en_US
ethz.code.ddc
DDC - DDC::7 - Arts & recreation::720 - Architecture
ethz.identifier.diss
26155
en_US
ethz.publication.place
Zurich
en_US
ethz.publication.status
published
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02115 - Dep. Bau, Umwelt und Geomatik / Dep. of Civil, Env. and Geomatic Eng.::02656 - Inst. f. Raum- und Landschaftsentw. / Inst Spatial and Landscape Development::03726 - Scholl, Bernd (emeritus)
en_US
ethz.leitzahl
ETH Zürich::00002 - ETH Zürich::00012 - Lehre und Forschung::00007 - Departemente::02100 - Dep. Architektur / Dep. of Architecture::02655 - Netzwerk Stadt u. Landschaft ARCH u BAUG / Network City and Landscape ARCH and BAUG
*
ethz.date.deposited
2019-11-06T11:11:24Z
ethz.source
FORM
ethz.eth
yes
en_US
ethz.availability
Open access
en_US
ethz.rosetta.installDate
2019-11-06T15:45:07Z
ethz.rosetta.lastUpdated
2023-02-06T17:49:37Z
ethz.rosetta.exportRequired
true
ethz.rosetta.versionExported
true
ethz.COinS
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.atitle=SPATIAL%20SYNERGIES%20-%20Synergies%20between%20formal%20and%20informal%20planning%20as%20a%20key%20concept%20towards%20spatial%20conflicts%20%E2%80%93%20the%20case%20of&rft.date=2019&rft.au=Papamichail,%20Theodora&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=SPATIAL%20SYNERGIES%20-%20Synergies%20between%20formal%20and%20informal%20planning%20as%20a%20key%20concept%20towards%20spatial%20conflicts%20%E2%80%93%20the%20case%20of
 Search print copy at ETH Library

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Publication type

Show simple item record