Metadata only
Date
2020-12Type
- Journal Article
Abstract
Two separate research programs have revealed two different factors that feature in our judgments of whether some entity persists. One program—inspired by Knobe—has found that normative considerations affect persistence judgments. For instance, people are more inclined to view a thing as persisting when the changes it undergoes lead to improvements. The other program—inspired by Kelemen—has found that teleological considerations affect persistence judgments. For instance, people are more inclined to view a thing as persisting when it preserves its purpose. Our goal in this paper is to determine what causes persistence judgments. Across four studies, we pit normative considerations against teleological considerations. And using causal modeling procedures, we find a consistent, robust pattern with teleological and not normative considerations directly causing persistence judgments. Our findings put teleology in the driver’s seat, while at the same time shedding further light on our folk notion of an object. Show more
Publication status
publishedExternal links
Journal / series
SyntheseVolume
Pages / Article No.
Publisher
SpringerSubject
Folk metaphysics; Objects; Persistence; Teleology; Normative considerationsOrganisational unit
09629 - Stremitzer, Alexander / Stremitzer, Alexander
More
Show all metadata